logo
justfamilies
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    22
    Feb

    Flying High On Pension Benefits

    Posted by Marina Ostrovskaya | (0) Comment

    Continental Airlines Inc. found out that several of its pilots obtained divorces to receive  benefits, concealed the divorces from their friends and families and later re-married after receiving the benefits.  Although the airline pursued action, the Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held on July 18, that Continental Airlines Inc. cannot recover lump sum pension plan benefits paid to pilots who allegedly got “sham divorces” in order to obtain payment of their benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. If a pilot is at least 50 years old, the pilot can assign his or her benefits to an ex-spouse, who in turn can then elect to receive those benefits regardless of whether or not the pilot is retired. 

    The airline alleged that pilots created this scheme because of fears that financial difficulties would result in their pension plans being taken over by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, that their benefits would be reduced upon retirement, and that the lump-sum option would become unavailable . The Court’s reasoning for denying relief to the airline is that it doesn’t want pension administrators to second guess state family court determinations.

    This decision is somewhat surprising. Putting aside for a moment that the reasoning seeks to respect a court’s divorce decision and give it full discretion, it also seems fraudulent. What’s really going on here? Is it a loophole to be taken advantage of or a deceitful plot to early payment of benefits? Isn’t it an unnecessary strain on court resources to have fake divorces and subsequent remarriages? Looks like the airline is out of luck and the pilots are flying high on their benefits.

    Learn more here

    Category : Divorce, Uncategorized

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Log In


    Forgot User ID/Password?

    Register
    Forgotten Password
    Cancel

    Search

    Links


  • Diane Abbey Law Center
  • More Links…
  • New York Family Court
  • Archives


  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • Events


  • Click here for our events
  • Classifications


  • Adoption
  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Child Abuse
  • Custody
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Education Law
  • Elder Law
  • Federal Law
  • Foster Care
  • International Family Law
  • Juvenile Rights
  • Marriage
  • New York Law
  • Parental Rights
    • Abortion
    • Surrender
  • Same-sex relationships
  • Surrogacy
  • Uncategorized
  • Visitation Rights
  • Wills
  • Subscribe


    RSS feed

    In a Reader

    Desktop Reader Bloglines Google Live Netvibes Newsgator Yahoo! What's This?

    Via E-mail:

    abortion absentee parents abuse abuser adoption adoption rates Afghanistan Alimony best interest of the child best interests of the child California celebrity child's interest Child abuse child pornography children discipline divorce DOMA domestic abuse domestic violence education extraordinary circumstances Get immigration Intestacy Jewish customs Jewish law Juvenile Justice juvenile justice system marriage Maryland modern marriage new york no-fault divorce NYC Public Schools obesity Parental Alienation Prenup restraining order same-sex marriage sex-offenders sperm donor unfit parent victim YouTube

    WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

    © 1997-2010 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Privacy | Terms | Non-Discrimination Policy | Webmasters